JDK-8141141 : Young and Old gen PLAB stats are similar in output with -XX:+PrintPLAB
- Type: Enhancement
- Component: hotspot
- Sub-Component: gc
- Affected Version: 9
- Priority: P4
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Fixed
- Submitted: 2015-11-02
- Updated: 2016-03-15
- Resolved: 2016-03-02
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 9 |
|---|
9 b110Fixed  |
Related Reports
|
Blocks :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
Description
We have -XX:+PrintPLAB flag which is allow to get plab allocation statistics. Output looks like (used -XX:+PrintGC -XX:+PrintPLAB options): #2: [GC pause (G1 Evacuation Pause) (young) (allocated = 519344 wasted = 4486 unused = 0 used = 514858 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 2 direct_allocated = 4944 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 102971 desired_plab_sz = 65536) (allocated = 3305338 wasted = 25813 unused = 806 used = 3278719 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 8 direct_allocated = 66 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 655743 desired_plab_sz = 65536) 53M->53M(376M), 0,1360649 secs] #3: [GC pause (G1 Evacuation Pause) (young) (allocated = 262144 wasted = 224 unused = 0 used = 261920 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 3 direct_allocated = 0 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 52384 desired_plab_sz = 60993) (allocated = 939085 wasted = 446 unused = 28700 used = 909939 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 16 direct_allocated = 3123 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 181987 desired_plab_sz = 65536) 79M->79M(599M), 0,1408361 secs] Each GC event has young and old PLAB statistics. In case if we use only -XX:+PrintPLAB, output looks like: (allocated = 258154 wasted = 2187 unused = 0 used = 255967 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 7 direct_allocated = 3990 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 51193 desired_plab_sz = 38394) (allocated = 1058480 wasted = 8538 unused = 905 used = 1049037 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 43 direct_allocated = 9962 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 209807 desired_plab_sz = 65536) (allocated = 912780 wasted = 7571 unused = 0 used = 905209 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 2 direct_allocated = 4724 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 181041 desired_plab_sz = 65536) (allocated = 5554141 wasted = 43337 unused = 1083 used = 5509721 undo_waste = 0 region_end_waste = 0 regions filled = 11 direct_allocated = 123 failure_used = 0 failure_waste = 0) (plab_sz = 1101944 desired_plab_sz = 65536) There young and old stats are interleaved. It would be good to point which PLAB statistics is printed - for young or for old gen.
Comments
|