Duplicate :
|
|
Duplicate :
|
|
Duplicate :
|
|
Relates :
|
FULL PRODUCT VERSION : java version "1.5.0" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing) ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION : Linux h126 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 #3 Wed May 26 13:14:46 CEST 2004 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux EXTRA RELEVANT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION : Konqueror 3.3 KDE 3.3.0 A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM : The generated HTML for the "START OF CLASS DATA" section in the HTML generated for a class is causing Konqueror to render the page in an erroneous way. This was not a problem with the Javadoc tool in JDK 1.4.2, so I looked at the differences between the generated files for 1.4.2 and 1.5.0. The problem is in this change: <HR> <DL> -<DT>public final class <B>XINSCallResult</B><DT>extends <A HREF="../../../org/xins/common/service/CallResult.html" title="class in org.xins.common.service">CallResult</A></DL> +<DT><PRE>public final class <B>XINSCallResult</B><DT>extends <A HREF="../../../org/xins/common/service/CallResult.html" title="class in org.xins.common.service">CallResult</A></DL> +</PRE> The problem here is that the tags are not closed in the correct order. Without the PCDATA text, the tags are: <DT><PRE><B></B><DT><A></A></DL></PRE> The PRE tagged should, however, be closed before the DL tag is closed. If you want screenshots, let me know. This happens for both 1.5.0-rc and for 1.5.0 (FCS). REGRESSION. Last worked in version 1.4.2_xx. STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM : Use javadoc for any set of classes. EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR : EXPECTED - Same as javadoc 1.4.2_05 ACTUAL - From Javadoc 1.5.0: I have attached the output from 5.0 as an attachment. REPRODUCIBILITY : This bug can be reproduced always. Release Regression From : 1.4.2 The above release value was the last known release where this bug was known to work. Since then there has been a regression. Release Regression From : 1.4.2 The above release value was the last known release where this bug was known to work. Since then there has been a regression. ###@###.### 2004-12-09 17:01:03 GMT CR 6329212 mentions: <DT> tags left unclosed.
|