JDK-4993194 : In class declaration, 
 tag has no matching
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: tools
  • Sub-Component: javadoc(tool)
  • Affected Version: 5.0
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic
  • CPU: generic
  • Submitted: 2004-02-11
  • Updated: 2014-05-05
  • Resolved: 2004-03-19
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
5.0 b44Fixed
Related Reports
Relates :  
JDK-6206490 - REGRESSION: Javadoc generates invalid HTML in "START OF CLASS DATA" section
Description

Name: dk30142			Date: 02/11/2004


I notice a bug where there is a <pre> with no </pre> tag:

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/annotation/Target.html

<dl>
<dt><pre><font SIZE="-1"><a HREF="../../../java/lang/annotation/Documented.html" 
title="annotation in java.lang.annotation">@Documented</a>
<a HREF="../../../java/lang/annotation/Retention.html" title="annotation in 
java.lang.annotation">@Retention</a>(value=RUNTIME)
<a HREF="../../../java/lang/annotation/Target.html" title="annotation in 
java.lang.annotation">@Target</a>(value=ANNOTATION_TYPE)
</font>public @interface <b>Target</b></dl>

For some reason, there is no visual impact on IE or Mozilla -- the </dl> seems
to turn off the <pre>, so it's a low-priority bug.

======================================================================
Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: tiger-beta2 FIXED IN: tiger-beta2 INTEGRATED IN: tiger-b44 tiger-beta2
14-06-2004
WORK AROUND Name: dk30142 Date: 02/11/2004 ======================================================================
11-06-2004
PUBLIC COMMENTS Fixed. The pre has to wrap around the entire signature declaration. If you only wrap it around the annotations, you end up with a blank line between the annotation and the signature. ###@###.### 2004-03-15
15-03-2004
EVALUATION Accepted ###@###.### 2004-02-13 Fixed. The <pre> is now closed with an </pre>. ###@###.### 2004-03-15
13-02-2004