JDK-8319901 : Recursive lightweight locking: ppc64le implementation
  • Type: Sub-task
  • Component: hotspot
  • Sub-Component: runtime
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • CPU: ppc
  • Submitted: 2023-11-10
  • Updated: 2024-03-25
  • Resolved: 2024-03-04
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 23
23 b13Fixed
Description
The ppc64le implementation of JDK-8319796 Recursive lightweight locking
Comments
A pull request was submitted for review. URL: https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput-jdk21u/pull/28 Date: 2024-03-25 19:02:03 +0000
25-03-2024

Changeset: b5cd7efc Author: Axel Boldt-Christmas <aboldtch@openjdk.org> Committer: Martin Doerr <mdoerr@openjdk.org> Date: 2024-03-04 16:01:08 +0000 URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/b5cd7efcebe0daaf8a85f0f32b65a3bd446674ef
04-03-2024

A pull request was submitted for review. URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16611 Date: 2023-11-10 13:21:58 +0000
20-02-2024

The prerequisite JDK-8319797 has been integrated, but the draft PR has merge conflicts. We should look at it again. We are currently busy with other things, so, this may take time. Generally, the PR was looking good when I had looked at it some time ago.
13-02-2024

[~mdoerr] How do you want to proceed with the Lightweight Recursive PPC code? Should Axel move the PR from Draft to Open, or do you want to take over and make suitable changes and then open a PR?
29-01-2024

Assigning this over to Axel since he's already built the PR for this, which is out for review.
29-01-2024

There's already a draft PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16611
24-01-2024