JDK-8259584 : SuperWord::fix_commutative_inputs checks in_bb(fin1) instead of in_bb(fin2)
- Type: Bug
- Component: hotspot
- Sub-Component: compiler
- Affected Version: 9,11,16,17
- Priority: P3
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Fixed
- Submitted: 2021-01-11
- Updated: 2021-02-04
- Resolved: 2021-01-29
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 17 |
|---|
17 b08Fixed  |
Related Reports
|
Relates :
|
Description
SonarCloud instance reports a problem here:
"Identical sub-expressions on both sides of operator "&&"."
bool swapped = false;
if (in_bb(gin1) && in_bb(gin2) && in_bb(fin1) && in_bb(fin1)) { // <----
if (same_origin_idx(gin1, fin1) &&
same_origin_idx(gin2, fin2)) {
return true; // nothing to fix
}
I believe it should have been "in_bb(fin1) && in_bb(fin2)".
Seems to be that way since JDK-8076284.
Comments
|