JDK-8255005 : Fix indentation levels in classFileParser.cpp
- Type: Enhancement
- Component: hotspot
- Sub-Component: runtime
- Affected Version: 16
- Priority: P4
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Fixed
- Submitted: 2020-10-19
- Updated: 2020-11-05
- Resolved: 2020-10-30
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 16 |
|---|
16 b23Fixed  |
Related Reports
|
Relates :
|
Description
The indentiation levels are off in this block of code in classFileParser.cpp:
} else if (_major_version >= JAVA_16_VERSION) {
if (tag == vmSymbols::tag_record()) {
// Skip over Record attribute if super class is not java.lang.Record.
if (cp->klass_name_at(_super_class_index) == vmSymbols::java_lang_Record()) {
if (parsed_record_attribute) {
classfile_parse_error("Multiple Record attributes in class file %s", THREAD);
return;
}
// Check that class is final and not abstract.
if (!_access_flags.is_final() || _access_flags.is_abstract()) {
classfile_parse_error("Record attribute in non-final or abstract class file %s", THREAD);
return;
}
parsed_record_attribute = true;
record_attribute_start = cfs->current();
record_attribute_length = attribute_length;
} else if (log_is_enabled(Info, class, record)) {
ResourceMark rm(THREAD);
log_info(class, record)(
"Ignoring Record attribute in class %s because super type is not java.lang.Record",
_class_name->as_C_string());
}
}
cfs->skip_u1(attribute_length, CHECK);
} else {
Comments
|