JDK-8246380 : Sealed classes: prohibit member classes of local/anonymous classes
- Type: Bug
- Component: tools
- Sub-Component: javac
- Affected Version: 15
- Priority: P4
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Not an Issue
- Submitted: 2020-06-02
- Updated: 2020-11-11
- Resolved: 2020-06-03
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 16 |
|---|
16Resolved  |
Related Reports
|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
Description
Per this design discussion: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2020-May/002161.html The consensus is that, at least until we revisit the topic, member classes of local/anonymous classes should not be allowed to use the 'sealed' modifier or to extend/implement a sealed class or interface. javac should be updated accordingly.
Comments
|