JDK-8242631 : Missing but used special functions for some classes
- Type: Enhancement
- Component: hotspot
- Sub-Component: runtime
- Affected Version: 15
- Priority: P4
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Fixed
- Submitted: 2020-04-14
- Updated: 2020-04-27
- Resolved: 2020-04-16
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 15 |
|---|
15 b20Fixed  |
Related Reports
|
Relates :
|
Description
C++11 12.8/7 and 12.8/18 say that a copy constructor or copy assignment operator will be implicitly defined under certain conditions, but that doing so is deprecated if the class has a user-declared destructor or user-declared copy or assign. gcc9 issues a deprecation warning in these situations when C++11 or C++14 is selected; earlier versions didn't. We have a few of these, and need to do something about them for JDK-8208089.
Comments
|