JDK-8213567 : [Graal] ReservedStackAccessTest fails with AssertionError: FAILED: ReentrantLock 419 looks corrupted
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: hotspot
  • Sub-Component: compiler
  • Affected Version: 12
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Duplicate
  • OS: windows
  • Submitted: 2018-11-08
  • Updated: 2020-08-26
  • Resolved: 2020-08-26
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 16
16Resolved
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
Relates :  
Relates :  
Description
org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccess graal unit test fails with StackOverflowError on Windows.
Comments
Closing as a duplicate of JDK-8067946. If there are failures on other platforms, please file a separate bug.
26-08-2020

Is this still failing? This test is currently on the problem list for Windows, and I can't find any recent failures associated with this bug. I'm tempted to close this as a duplicate of JDK-8067946, or problem-list it for all platforms, since we already have coverage for this feature in the jtreg tests.
21-08-2020

And it's happening with C1 only using -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 suggesting that there are fundamental problems with the ReservedStackAccess annotation handling. I think the new failures are because of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229442 which added new uses of that annotation but those methods aren't excluded in the jtreg command line. The fact that the test requires methods to be excluded suggests the ReservedStackAccess is fundamentally broken. My recollection is that the unguarding and reguarding of the reserved stack space is done at the nmethod level instead of at the boundaries of the inlined call so if your nmethod starts executing into a reserved space then it's made available to all further execution within that nmethod until it returns. So you're basically exposed to the original problem if you call out of the nmethod after unguarding the ReservedStackAccess space. Anyway, the implementation just seems totally broken to me.
27-05-2020

So this bug was originally about running the test on Windows, and it was concluded that things don't work on Windows and so the test should not be run. The "I also see this failing on Linux" apparently arose because of JDK-8229442, and we still have an open issue in relation to that - JDK-8231031.
27-05-2020

I just checked the test with latest jdk14 and the test fails on Linux as well: java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.Reentra ntLock.lock()V [1] Framework got StackOverflowError at frame = 1382 Test started execution at frame = 1126 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test. ReservedStackAccessTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V [1] Framework got StackOverflowError at frame = 3674 Test started execution at frame = 3418 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError: FAILED: ReentrantLock 575 looks corrupted at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest.stackAccessTest(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:56) at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest.main(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:65) To run just this unit test crate test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/graalunit/Bug.java /* * @test * @summary * @requires vm.opt.final.EnableJVMCI == true * @modules jdk.internal.vm.compiler * @library /test/lib /compiler/graalunit / * @build compiler.graalunit.common.GraalUnitTestLauncher * @run main compiler.graalunit.common.GraalUnitTestLauncher -prefix org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest */ and then just run: > bash jib.sh make -- run-test TEST=compiler/graalunit/Bug.java TEST_VM_OPTS="-server -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableJVMCI" [~thartmann] Tobias, could you please have a look if this is a new issue?
07-11-2019

Thanks Doug and Dean for looking at this!
20-11-2018

I agree with Tobias that this test can't be safely run on Windows. We already have a JDK test that's almost identical, so I'm not sure we need to run this graalunit test in JDK at all.
19-11-2018

[~never] or [~dlong] may have some insights on this issue.
19-11-2018

Thanks for the clarifications, David!
19-11-2018

It's the StackOverflowError (in the wrong place) that can lead to a corrupt ReentrantLock. This is testing the stack reservation mechanism which tries to ensure there are no stackoverflows when executing critical lock code. With Graal involved I can easily imagine that the stack will still overflow as the Graal frames will not be accounted for in the reserved area. Update: but I didn't know about the limitation running on Windows.
19-11-2018

I wonder if this test should be executed on Windows at all. The corresponding hotspot test (runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTest.java), has a special case for Windows: // Either the test passed or this platform is not supported. // On not supported platforms, we only expect the VM to // not crash during the test. This is especially important // on Windows where the detection of SOE in annotated // sections is implemented but the reserved zone mechanism // to avoid the corruption cannot be implemented yet // because of JDK-8067946 [~dnsimon], what do you think? ILW = Graal test fails (probably test bug), intermittent with single test on Windows, no workaround = MLH = P4
19-11-2018

So isn't the real failure this one? java.lang.AssertionError: FAILED: ReentrantLock 419 looks corrupted The StackOverflowError looks like it's expected and part of the normal log output of the test. Similar failures were observed with the hotspot test runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTest.java and fixed in the past: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22ReentrantLock%20looks%20corrupted%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
19-11-2018

Here is the log: ext.recursiveCall(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:214) at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:214) ... at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:214) at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:214) Framework got StackOverflowError at frame = 6191 Test started execution at frame = 5935 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError: FAILED: ReentrantLock 419 looks corrupted at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest.stackAccessTest(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:57) at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest.main(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:66) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.nonfairTryAcquire(I)Z [1] Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.nonfairTryAcquire(I)Z [1] Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.nonfairTryAcquire(I)Z [1] ----------System.err:(1004/91685)---------- stdout: [MxJUnitCore JUnit version 4.12 org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.AheadOfTimeCompilationTest started (1 of 40) testPrimitiveClassObject: Passed 2746.9 ms testBoxedBooleanAOT: Passed 180.6 ms testClassObject: Passed 13.4 ms testStaticFinalObjectAOT: Passed 47.5 ms testBoxedBoolean: Passed 10.7 ms testStaticFinalObject: Passed 9.0 ms testStringObject: Passed 10.7 ms testClassObjectAOT: Passed 12.5 ms testStringObjectAOT: Passed 9.5 ms testPrimitiveClassObjectAOT: Passed 13.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.AheadOfTimeCompilationTest finished 3061.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayCopyIntrinsificationTest started (2 of 40) testObjectExact: Passed 999.2 ms testInt: Passed 465.0 ms testFloat: Passed 415.9 ms testShort: Passed 371.8 ms testByte: Passed 283.8 ms testChar: Passed 268.7 ms testLong: Passed 271.1 ms testDisjointObject: Passed 238.0 ms test0: Passed 181.4 ms test1: Passed 66.0 ms testCopyRows: Passed 717.7 ms testArrayStoreException: Passed 34.1 ms testDouble: Passed 266.1 ms testObject: Passed 395.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayCopyIntrinsificationTest finished 4981.9 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest started (3 of 40) testNewArrayInLoop[0: class byte length -1]: Passed 891.4 ms testNewArray[0: class byte length -1]: Passed 42.4 ms testNewArrayInLoop[1: class byte length 0]: Passed 77.3 ms testNewArray[1: class byte length 0]: Passed 35.1 ms testNewArrayInLoop[2: class byte length 42]: Passed 64.6 ms testNewArray[2: class byte length 42]: Passed 34.2 ms testNewArrayInLoop[3: class boolean length -1]: Passed 58.9 ms testNewArray[3: class boolean length -1]: Passed 32.9 ms testNewArrayInLoop[4: class boolean length 0]: Passed 69.4 ms testNewArray[4: class boolean length 0]: Passed 35.6 ms testNewArrayInLoop[5: class boolean length 42]: Passed 111.1 ms testNewArray[5: class boolean length 42]: Passed 30.8 ms testNewArrayInLoop[6: class short length -1]: Passed 55.2 ms testNewArray[6: class short length -1]: Passed 33.9 ms testNewArrayInLoop[7: class short length 0]: Passed 60.2 ms testNewArray[7: class short length 0]: Passed 34.6 ms testNewArrayInLoop[8: class short length 42]: Passed 57.0 ms testNewArray[8: class short length 42]: Passed 29.6 ms testNewArrayInLoop[9: class char length -1]: Passed 102.2 ms testNewArray[9: class char length -1]: Passed 27.6 ms testNewArrayInLoop[10: class char length 0]: Passed 47.3 ms testNewArray[10: class char length 0]: Passed 29.0 ms testNewArrayInLoop[11: class char length 42]: Passed 52.1 ms testNewArray[11: class char length 42]: Passed 29.3 ms testNewArrayInLoop[12: class int length -1]: Passed 63.7 ms testNewArray[12: class int length -1]: Passed 22.9 ms testNewArrayInLoop[13: class int length 0]: Passed 42.8 ms testNewArray[13: class int length 0]: Passed 23.7 ms testNewArrayInLoop[14: class int length 42]: Passed 45.1 ms testNewArray[14: class int length 42]: Passed 36.1 ms testNewArrayInLoop[15: class long length -1]: Passed 63.3 ms testNewArray[15: class long length -1]: Passed 41.5 ms testNewArrayInLoop[16: class long length 0]: Passed 38.8 ms testNewArray[16: class long length 0]: Passed 24.2 ms testNewArrayInLoop[17: class long length 42]: Passed 44.1 ms testNewArray[17: class long length 42]: Passed 25.5 ms testNewArrayInLoop[18: class class java.lang.Void length -1]: Passed 43.6 ms testNewArray[18: class class java.lang.Void length -1]: Passed 87.0 ms testNewArrayInLoop[19: class class java.lang.Void length 0]: Passed 58.3 ms testNewArray[19: class class java.lang.Void length 0]: Passed 22.5 ms testNewArrayInLoop[20: class class java.lang.Void length 42]: Passed 62.4 ms testNewArray[20: class class java.lang.Void length 42]: Passed 26.2 ms testNewArrayInLoop[21: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length -1]: Passed 44.2 ms testNewArray[21: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length -1]: Passed 25.4 ms testNewArrayInLoop[22: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length 0]: Passed 48.6 ms testNewArray[22: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length 0]: Passed 28.4 ms testNewArrayInLoop[23: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length 42]: Passed 43.9 ms testNewArray[23: class class org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest length 42]: Passed 22.9 ms testNewArrayInLoop[24: class void length -1]: Passed 46.7 ms testNewArray[24: class void length -1]: ....org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ArrayNewInstanceTest finished org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CRC32CSubstitutionsTest started (4 of 40) test1: Passed 5795.2 ms test2: Passed 1969.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CRC32CSubstitutionsTest finished 7766.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CRC32SubstitutionsTest started (5 of 40) test1: Passed 79.6 ms test2: Passed 157.9 ms test3: Passed 319.4 ms test4: Passed 439.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CRC32SubstitutionsTest finished 1001.5 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CheckGraalIntrinsics started (6 of 40) test: Passed 300.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CheckGraalIntrinsics finished 302.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ClassSubstitutionsTests started (7 of 40) testFieldIsNotArray: Passed 10.2 ms testIsPrimitive: Passed 3.9 ms testFieldIsArray: Passed 6.7 ms testFoldComponentType: Passed 8.3 ms testIsInterface: Passed 5.3 ms testClassIsAssignable: Passed 26.7 ms testIsArray: Passed 7.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ClassSubstitutionsTests finished 72.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CompileTheWorldTest started (8 of 40) testJDK: CompileTheWorld : Done (5 classes, 5 methods, 785 ms, 1367168 bytes of memory used) Passed 3497.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CompileTheWorldTest finished 3498.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CompressedOopTest started (9 of 40) test11: Passed 30.9 ms test12: Passed 16.4 ms test13: Passed 37.0 ms test14: Passed 93.5 ms test15: Passed 215.9 ms test16: Passed 129.8 ms test17: Passed 4274.9 ms test18: Passed 18.2 ms test: Passed 25.5 ms test1: Passed 56.5 ms test2: Passed 15.2 ms test3: Passed 20.8 ms test4: Passed 57.6 ms test5: Passed 32.0 ms test6: Passed 129.8 ms test7: Passed 834.4 ms test8: Passed 42.7 ms test9: Passed 16.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.CompressedOopTest finished 6089.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ConstantPoolSubstitutionsTests started (10 of 40) testGetIntAt: Passed 192.6 ms testGetDoubleAt: Passed 26.5 ms testGetSize: Passed 164.4 ms testGetFloatAt: Passed 10.6 ms testGetLongAt: Passed 9.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ConstantPoolSubstitutionsTests finished 406.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.DataPatchTest started (11 of 40) oopTest: Passed 19.7 ms narrowOopTest: Passed 5.1 ms doubleTest: Passed 4.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.DataPatchTest finished 30.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.EliminateRedundantInitializationPhaseTest started (12 of 40) test10: Passed 202.3 ms test1: Passed 3.0 ms test2: Passed 3.4 ms test3: Passed 2.7 ms test4: Passed 2.4 ms test5: Passed 3.9 ms test6: Passed 2.9 ms test7: Passed 2.3 ms test8: Passed 4.0 ms test9: Passed 2.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.EliminateRedundantInitializationPhaseTest finished 234.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ExplicitExceptionTest started (13 of 40) testNPE: Passed 684.6 ms testNPEArray: Passed 672.6 ms testAIOOBE: Passed 561.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ExplicitExceptionTest finished 1920.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ForeignCallDeoptimizeTest started (14 of 40) test1: Passed 54.1 ms test2: Passed 36.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ForeignCallDeoptimizeTest finished 136.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.GraalOSRLockTest started (15 of 40) testLockOSRRecursive: Passed 1525.7 ms testLockOSROuterCompileRestOfMethod: Passed 6674.1 ms testLockOSROuterInnerLockDepthRecursiveCompileRestOfMethod0: Passed 769.5 ms testLockOSROuterInnerLockDepthRecursiveCompileRestOfMethod1: Passed 769.3 ms testLockOSRRecursiveLeafOSR: Passed 1573.6 ms testLockOSROuterInnerSameLockCompileRestOfMethod: Passed 843.0 ms testLockOSROuterInnerCompileRestOfMethod: Passed 1480.6 ms testSynchronizedSnippet: Passed 223.0 ms testLockOSROuterCompileRestOfMethodSubsequentLock: Passed 760.3 ms testOSRTrivialLoop: Passed 720.8 ms testLockOSROuterInnerImmediateDeoptAfter: Passed 837.7 ms testLockOSROuterInnerLockDepthDeopt: Passed 731.4 ms testLockOSROuterInnerLockDepthCompileRestOfMethod: Passed 1516.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.GraalOSRLockTest finished 20788.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotCryptoSubstitutionTest started (16 of 40) testAESCryptIntrinsics: Passed 50.7 ms testCipherBlockChainingIntrinsics: Passed 112.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotCryptoSubstitutionTest finished 186.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotGraalManagementTest started (17 of 40) registration: Passed 3063.2 ms readBeanInfo: Passed 7336.5 ms publicJmxApiOfGraalDumpOperation: Passed 2271.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotGraalManagementTest finished 12674.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotInvokeDynamicPluginTest started (18 of 40) test1: Passed 57.1 ms test2: Passed 40.4 ms test3: Passed 70.5 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotInvokeDynamicPluginTest finished 169.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotLazyInitializationTest started (19 of 40) test1: Passed 18.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotLazyInitializationTest finished 19.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotMethodSubstitutionTest started (20 of 40) testGetClass: Passed 287.3 ms testObjectSubstitutions: Passed 57.7 ms testCast: Passed 47.0 ms testThreadSubstitutions: Passed 31.4 ms testClassSubstitutions: Passed 79.7 ms testSystemSubstitutions: Passed 7.5 ms testCallSiteGetTarget: Passed 2025.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotMethodSubstitutionTest finished 2538.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotMonitorValueTest started (21 of 40) test: Passed 193.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotMonitorValueTest finished 194.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotNmethodTest started (22 of 40) testInstalledCodeCalledFromCompiledCode: Passed 371.7 ms testInstallCodeInvalidationWhileRunning: Passed 12.4 ms testInstallCodeInvalidation: Passed 12.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotNmethodTest finished 398.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotNodeSubstitutionsTest started (23 of 40) test: Passed 8.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotNodeSubstitutionsTest finished 11.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotResolvedJavaFieldTest started (24 of 40) testEquivalenceForInternalFields: Passed 28.1 ms testIsInObject: Passed 1.0 ms testModifiersForInternal: Passed 0.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotResolvedJavaFieldTest finished 31.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotResolvedObjectTypeTest started (25 of 40) testGetSourceFileName: Passed 2.7 ms testKlassLayoutHelper: Passed 0.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotResolvedObjectTypeTest finished 103.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotStackIntrospectionTest started (26 of 40) run: (got: <false>, expected: is <true>) Passed 135.5 ms runSynchronized: (got: <false>, expected: is <true>) Passed 2.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotStackIntrospectionTest finished 138.9 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotStampMemoryAccessTest started (27 of 40) testReadNarrowObject: Passed 1.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotStampMemoryAccessTest finished 1.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotUnsafeSubstitutionTest started (28 of 40) testCopyMemory: Passed 27.9 ms testUnsafeSubstitutions: Passed 32.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HotSpotUnsafeSubstitutionTest finished 62.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HsErrLogTest started (29 of 40) test1: Passed 14381.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.HsErrLogTest finished 14382.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.InstalledCodeExecuteHelperTest started (30 of 40) test1: Passed 15572.8 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.InstalledCodeExecuteHelperTest finished 15574.4 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.JVMCIInfopointErrorTest started (31 of 40) testInvalidShortOop: Passed 52.8 ms testUnsupportedConstantType: Passed 28.3 ms testUnexpectedScopeSlotKindsLength: Passed 27.4 ms testInvalidShortDerivedOop: Passed 25.2 ms testDuplicateVirtualObject: Passed 23.1 ms testUndefinedVirtualObject: Passed 20.3 ms testUnexpectedIllegalValue: Passed 21.5 ms testWrongMonitorType: Passed 17.7 ms testInvalidVirtualObjectId: Passed 16.6 ms testUnknownJavaValue: Passed 42.6 ms testUnexpectedVirtualObject: Passed 21.3 ms testMissingIllegalAfterDouble: Passed 17.2 ms testUnexpectedScopeValuesLength: Passed 17.7 ms testUnexpectedTypeInRegister: Passed 18.6 ms testUnexpectedObject: Passed 19.2 ms testWrongConstantType: Passed 22.1 ms testUnexpectedNull: Passed 22.7 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.JVMCIInfopointErrorTest finished 435.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.LoadJavaMirrorWithKlassTest started (32 of 40) testClassConstant: Passed 4.8 ms testPrimitiveClassConstant: Passed 5.1 ms testCompressedPrimitiveClassConstant: Passed 35.5 ms testCompressedClassConstant: Passed 26.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.LoadJavaMirrorWithKlassTest finished 73.6 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ObjectCloneTest started (33 of 40) testNotIntrinsified: Passed 26.1 ms testCloneConstantArray: Passed 12.6 ms testArray: Passed 53.3 ms testList: Passed 135.5 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ObjectCloneTest finished 229.0 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.OptionsInFileTest started (34 of 40) test: Passed 2083.2 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.OptionsInFileTest finished 2083.9 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReplaceConstantNodesPhaseTest started (35 of 40) test1: Passed 153.1 ms test2: Passed 3.3 ms test3: Passed 17.0 ms test4: Passed 27.9 ms test5: Passed 2.2 ms test6: Passed 2.7 ms test7: Passed 2.1 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReplaceConstantNodesPhaseTest finished 210.3 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest started (36 of 40) run: FAILED run(org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest) java.lang.AssertionError at org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest.run(ReservedStackAccessTest.java:88) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:567) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137) at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:115) at com.oracle.mxtool.junit.MxJUnitWrapper.runRequest(MxJUnitWrapper.java:280) at com.oracle.mxtool.junit.MxJUnitWrapper.main(MxJUnitWrapper.java:196) 2569.5 ms org.graalvm.compiler.hotspot.test.ReservedStackAccessTest finished 2570.1 ms
13-11-2018

[~epavlova], could you please attach log files or job links? Thanks.
12-11-2018