JDK-8196130 : Eclipse configuration files need to be updated
  • Type: Task
  • Component: javafx
  • Sub-Component: other
  • Affected Version: 10
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: other
  • CPU: x86
  • Submitted: 2018-01-25
  • Updated: 2019-03-30
  • Resolved: 2018-02-07
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
openjfx11Fixed
Related Reports
Relates :  
Relates :  
Description
FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
openjdk version "10-internal" 2018-03-20
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 10-internal+0-adhoc.Nir.jdk)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 10-internal+0-adhoc.Nir.jdk, mixed mode)

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Eclipse IDE .classpath files are outdated and cause project-level errors in the IDE. As an example, the graphics project's .classpath includes the lines

<classpathentry kind="src" exported="true" path="build/resources/jsl-decora"/>
<classpathentry kind="src" exported="true" path="build/resources/jsl-prism"/>

which do not point to existing paths.

STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Import the OpenJFX projects into eclipse. The errors appear on the project-level

EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
No configuration errors
ACTUAL -
Configuration errors

REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.

CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
Use the Gradle builder and ignore the IDE errors.


Comments
Changeset: 31e59a538bfa Author: kcr Date: 2018-02-07 08:43 +0530 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt/rev/31e59a538bfa 8196130: Eclipse configuration files need to be updated Reviewed-by: kcr Contributed-by: nlisker@gmail.com
07-02-2018

Looks good.
07-02-2018

Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-February/021389.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-February/021390.html
07-02-2018