JDK-8148571 : Curious failure of java/awt/Frame/SetMaximizedBounds/SetMaximizedBounds.java
- Type: Bug
- Component: client-libs
- Sub-Component: java.awt
- Affected Version: 9
- Priority: P2
- Status: Closed
- Resolution: Fixed
- Submitted: 2016-01-29
- Updated: 2016-08-16
- Resolved: 2016-07-22
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 9 |
|---|
9 teamFixed  |
Related Reports
|
Duplicate :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
Description
RULE "java/awt/Frame/SetMaximizedBounds/SetMaximizedBounds.java" Exception java.lang.RuntimeException: The bounds of the Frame do not equal to what is specified when the frame is in Frame.MAXIMIZED_BOTH state
The test fails with this exception on Windows 7 x64 on the first step for decorated Frame. The code goes like this:
Rectangle bounds = frame.getBounds();
if (!bounds.equals(maximizedBounds)) {
throw new RuntimeException("The bounds of the Frame do not equal to what"
+ " is specified when the frame is in Frame.MAXIMIZED_BOTH state");
}
Now, they are not equals(). If, however, you print both bounds and maximizedBounds immediately before 'if' statement, they are both java.awt.Rectangle and have exactly the same coordinates and width/height.
The test does pass with b66 but fails with b98 and the current PIT for b105.
Comments
|