JDK-8001214 : java/awt/Frame/MaximizedToIconified/MaximizedToIconified.java failed on ubuntu 12
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: java.awt
  • Affected Version: 7,8
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Duplicate
  • OS: linux_ubuntu
  • CPU: x86
  • Submitted: 2012-10-22
  • Updated: 2014-08-21
  • Resolved: 2014-06-03
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 9
9Resolved
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
JDK-8012224 - AWT_TopLevels/TopLevelEvents/Automated/WindowIconifyDeiconifyEventsTest02 fails on Ubuntu 12.04 Unity shell
Relates :  
JDK-6573172 - PIT: test/java/awt/Frame/MaximizedToIconified/MaximizedToIconified.java fails
Description
test java/awt/Frame/MaximizedToIconified/MaximizedToIconified.java failed on ubuntu 12 x86 (Unity desktop) since jdk 7 fcs and with jdk6, but passed on oel5.6 x86 and windows xp x86, solaris 10 x86

Output is different from time to time. Sometimes test failed with "java.lang.RuntimeException: getExtendedState() != 1 as expected." and sometimes test failed with "java.lang.RuntimeException: getExtendedState() != last getNewState() in WINDOW_STATE_CHANGED event."

see comments for more details
Comments
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
Converted "8-client-defer-candidate" label to "8-defer-request" by SQE' OK.
15-08-2013
*This is anti-deferral criteria list*: - P2 -------------- Engineering's Criteria ------------------------------------- - tck-red labeled - conformance labeled - P3 regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - findbugs, parfait, eht labeled bugs - CAP <1 year reported - netbeans <1 year reported Victor ----------------- SQE's OK --------------------------------- Yes, we are ok with that thanks, Mikhail
15-08-2013
8-defer-request: This is the issue reproduced from 7 GA, this is not a regression in 8, requesting to defer because there are no customer escalations on this issue.
17-06-2013
I can reproduce the problem with jdk1.7.0b95.
17-12-2012