JDK-7107535 : closed/javax/swing/RepaintManager/4939857/bug4939857.java failed on ubuntu x86 and oel6
Type:Bug
Component:client-libs
Sub-Component:javax.swing
Affected Version:5.0,6u28,7,8,9,10
Priority:P3
Status:Closed
Resolution:Duplicate
OS:linux_oracle_6.0,linux_ubuntu,os_x
CPU:x86
Submitted:2011-11-02
Updated:2020-01-29
Resolved:2018-09-06
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed. Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved. Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
test failed on ubuntu 10 x86 since FCS
passed on other platforms: win xp x86, ubuntu 10 x64, oel5.6
see comments for more details
Comments
RULE closed/javax/swing/RepaintManager/4939857/bug4939857.java Exception java.lang.Exception: Stack trace
RULE closed/javax/swing/RepaintManager/4939857/bug4939857.java Exception java.lang.RuntimeException: To many paints: ...
20-03-2015
- this is an issue reported against 7(7u),
- there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue
- 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining
Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9
or
7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014
- this is an issue reported against 7(7u),
- there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue
- 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining
Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9
or
7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9.
Kind regards,
Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9.
Kind regards,
Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9.
Kind regards,
Mathias
29-08-2013
Converted "8-client-defer-candidate" label to "8-defer-request" by SQE' OK.
15-08-2013
*This is anti-deferral criteria list*:
- P2
-------------- Engineering's Criteria -------------------------------------
- tck-red labeled
- conformance labeled
- P3 regressions reported/labeled against jdk8
- findbugs, parfait, eht labeled bugs
- CAP <1 year reported
- netbeans <1 year reported
Victor
----------------- SQE's OK ---------------------------------
Yes, we are ok with that
thanks, Mikhail
15-08-2013
8-defer-request:
This is the issue reproduced from 7 GA, this is not a regression in 8, requesting to defer because there are no customer escalations on this issue.