JDK-6970771 : Some regression manual tests failed due to the tag @run main/manual=yesno not accepted by jtreg
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: 2d
  • Affected Version:
    6u21,7,10,11,12,13,17,18,20,21,22,23,24 6u21,7,10,11,12,13,17,18,20,21,22,23,24
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Open
  • Resolution: Unresolved
  • Submitted: 2010-07-21
  • Updated: 2024-12-23
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
tbdUnresolved
Related Reports
Relates :  
Relates :  
Relates :  
Relates :  
Relates :  
Relates :  
Description
Bug Description: Workspace for 2d regression needs to update.
Testsuite name: 2D
JDK/JRE tested: 6u21b06(jdk-6u21-fcs-bin-b06-windows-i586-22_jun_2010.exe)
OS/architecture: winxphome-sp3-x86

Actual behavior:
These cases errored out, please see the attached html for details. These errors seem not to be caused by the regression itself. We believe the workspace needs to be updated.

Comments
I updated the subject of the bug because `@run applet/manual=yesno` is valid and is accepted by jtreg. The tag `@run main/manual=yesno` is invalid, and jtreg rejects it with an error message: Error. Parse Exception: Arguments to `manual' option not supported: yesno
20-06-2024

javax/print/StreamPrintingOrientation.java fails because it is not declared public. I submitted JDK-8332911 to address the problem.
24-05-2024

- this is an issue reported against 7(7u), - there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue - 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9 or 7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014

- this is an issue reported against 7(7u), - there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue - 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9 or 7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014

These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013

These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013

These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013

Converted "8-client-defer-candidate" label to "8-defer-request" by SQE' OK.
15-08-2013

*This is anti-deferral criteria list*: - P2 -------------- Engineering's Criteria ------------------------------------- - tck-red labeled - conformance labeled - P3 regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - findbugs, parfait, eht labeled bugs - CAP <1 year reported - netbeans <1 year reported Victor ----------------- SQE's OK --------------------------------- Yes, we are ok with that thanks, Mikhail
15-08-2013