JDK-6962697 : Crash in is_call_to_interpreted@CompiledIC / process_nmethod@NMethodSweeper
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: hotspot
  • Sub-Component: compiler
  • Affected Version: hs19
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Duplicate
  • OS: generic
  • CPU: generic
  • Submitted: 2010-06-21
  • Updated: 2014-05-08
  • Resolved: 2011-05-08
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 8
8-poolResolved
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
JDK-6996747 - SIGSEGV in nmethod::cleanup_inline_caches / CompiledIC::verify
Relates :  
JDK-6957825 - "CodeCache is full. Compiler has been disabled" after 23 hours
Relates :  
JDK-6956958 - assert(is_clean() || is_call_to_compiled() || is_call_to_interpreted() || is_optimized() || is_megam
Relates :  
JDK-6966246 - Crash in nmethod::cleanup_inline_caches / CompiledIC::verify
Description
Application run with -XX:+UseCodeCacheFlushing causes VM to crash with EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005). JDK 7 b97, hs 19 b02 windows-i586 fastdebug VM was used.

V  [jvm.dll+0xed6d3];;  ?is_call_to_interpreted@CompiledIC@@QBE_NXZ+0x103
V  [jvm.dll+0x3220d6];;  ?process_nmethod@NMethodSweeper@@CAXPAVnmethod@@@Z+0x2c6
V  [jvm.dll+0x322479];;  ?sweep_code_cache@NMethodSweeper@@SAXXZ+0x119
V  [jvm.dll+0x322a75];;  ?possibly_sweep@NMethodSweeper@@SAXXZ+0x35
V  [jvm.dll+0xebe30];;  ?compiler_thread_loop@CompileBroker@@SAXXZ+0x180
V  [jvm.dll+0x34f087];;  ?thread_main_inner@JavaThread@@QAEXXZ+0xb7
V  [jvm.dll+0x2c2c34];;  ?java_start@@YGIPAVThread@@@Z+0xb4
C  [msvcr71.dll+0x9565]
C  [kernel32.dll+0x13677]
C  [ntdll.dll+0x39d72]
C  [ntdll.dll+0x39d45]
It is unlikely we can fix this bug in 7, targeting to 8.
Comments
EVALUATION I have been unable to reproduce after several weeks of trying. Are you able to reproduce this? If so can you point me to a setup where I can do some debugging?
03-05-2011