|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
|
|
Relates :
|
FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.6.0_11"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_11-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.0-b16, mixed mode, sharing)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Windows XP SP3
EXTRA RELEVANT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION :
P4 2.8HT
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Semaphore initial state 0. 4 threads run 4 tasks.
Two threads run acquire semaphore once, the other two threads run release semaphore once.
One possible result is the semaphore state value is 1 and one thread still waiting.
The possible reason:
When AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#release are called, head.waitStatus may be 0 because the previous acquire thread may run at AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#doAcquireShared before setHeadAndPropagate is called.
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
The given executable test case will hung. Suggest using dual-core CPU or HT CPU to reproduce.
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced occasionally.
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
public class TestSemaphore {
private static Semaphore sem = new Semaphore(0);
private static class Thread1 extends Thread {
@Override
public void run() {
sem.acquireUninterruptibly();
}
}
private static class Thread2 extends Thread {
@Override
public void run() {
sem.release();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
Thread t1 = new Thread1();
Thread t2 = new Thread1();
Thread t3 = new Thread2();
Thread t4 = new Thread2();
t1.start();
t2.start();
t3.start();
t4.start();
t1.join();
t2.join();
t3.join();
t4.join();
System.out.println(i);
}
}
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
|