Please refer to 6176978
Scott indicates that a different fix must be attempted for JDK 6. Possibly this
is what is needed. BEA is interested in seeing this fixed.
Comments
EVALUATION
In 6176978, Scott indicated a different fix for JDK 6 was "desirable", not "required". Im any event, the proposal involved new API which cannot be added now that 6 is FCS.
Depending on your point of view, this bug is either Will Not Fix or a Dup of 6176978. 6176978 should have a subCR opened for 6.