JDK-4982231 : Go back to using '$' instead of '+' in names of synthetic members
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: tools
  • Sub-Component: javac
  • Affected Version: 5.0
  • Priority: P2
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic,solaris_2.6
  • CPU: generic,sparc
  • Submitted: 2004-01-22
  • Updated: 2017-05-16
  • Resolved: 2004-02-20
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
5.0 b40Fixed
Related Reports
Relates :  
JDK-6198765 - spurious anonymous classes on Serialized Form page
Relates :  
JDK-4923163 - NullPointerException thrown in ClassDoc.superclassType()
Relates :  
JDK-4972597 - REGRESSION:BeanContextSupport.BCSChild changed its serialVersionUID
Relates :  
JDK-4972593 - REGRESSION:BeanContextServicesSupport.BCSSChild changed its serialVersionUID
Relates :  
JDK-4996984 - REGRESSION: api/java_applet/Applet/AccessibleApplet/serial/index.html#Input
Description
The recent change to using '+' instead of '$' in the names of synthetic
members and class-file names has resulted in serial-form incompatibilities
and in broken builds.  It should be changed back to '$', at least in the
cases of synthetic members whose names affect the serial form of a class
(e.g., this$0) and/or the computation of the default serial-version UID,
and in the cases of class-file names as stored in the filesystem and in
jar files.

-- ###@###.### 2004/1/22
Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: tiger-beta2 FIXED IN: tiger-beta2 INTEGRATED IN: tiger-b40 tiger-beta2
14-06-2004
PUBLIC COMMENTS ...
10-06-2004
EVALUATION This request is to back out changes approved under 4884881. ###@###.### 2004-01-22 This will be a pain to fix without breaking JCK test lex06020. ###@###.### 2004-02-08
22-01-2004