JDK-4365371 : Remove Motif dependency for headless Java
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: java.awt
  • Affected Version: 1.4.0
  • Priority: P2
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic,solaris_7,solaris_8
  • CPU: sparc
  • Submitted: 2000-08-24
  • Updated: 2001-09-13
  • Resolved: 2001-04-16
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
1.4.0 betaFixed
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
JDK-4434196 - Crash on fonts in headless mode - Solaris only, build 58
Duplicate :  
JDK-4432814 - JCK13a 13 tests failed with "native code outside the VM" error on headless test
Relates :  
JDK-4426313 - Remove awt_KeyStroke.c
Relates :  
JDK-4434668 - Crash on fonts in headless mode - Solaris only, build 58
Relates :  
JDK-4407772 - basic headless graphics operations don't work in headless mode.
Relates :  
JDK-4426304 - AWT solaris build changes
Description
There is still a link dependency on Motif in headless Java.
This needs to be removed before FCS.

=============================================
JCK bug 4432814 has been closed as duplicate of 4365371 has been verifed for build 63 merlin-beta and the tests passed.

srilakshmi.chappidi@Eng 2001-06-27
Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: merlin-beta FIXED IN: merlin-beta INTEGRATED IN: merlin-beta VERIFIED IN: merlin-beta2
14-06-2004
EVALUATION Committing to merlin. michael.martak@Eng 2000-08-23 I've reopened this since it seems the work was insufficient. michael.martak@Eng 2001-02-05 This seems to have appeared on the list of bugs approved for Merlin-beta, so I am assuming it is a required fix for beta1. eric.hawkes@eng 2001-04-13 The failures reported in the comments are a duplicate of 4434668, which will be integrated in build 61. This bug should never have been removed from the integrated state, since it was integrated in build 57 or 58. michael.martak@Eng 2001-04-16
16-04-2001