Duplicate :
|
|
Duplicate :
|
|
Duplicate :
|
|
Relates :
|
|
Relates :
|
|
Relates :
|
|
Relates :
|
|
Relates :
|
Note: this bug was originally filed for modular jars linking to non-modular documentation. It was updated to include the inverse case as well. The javadoc tool fails with "The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in $URL are in the unnamed module." when it consumes Java modules which published their API documentation in a non-modular fashion. "javadoc ... -link https://ota4j-team.github.io/opentest4j/docs/1.2.0/api" fails due to: - Module "org.opentest4j" ships with a compiled module descriptor - Its API documentation is generated and published without modules Being in the transition phase from the non-modular to the modular world, this kind of work-around will show up more often. Library authors will inject "module-info.class" files into their library JAR files ... without producing modular API documentation at the same time, for a while. Perhaps, javadoc may try to fall-back to the non-modular API input format, if it cosumes a "-link"ed module that lacks modular API documentation files. Modular example project: https://github.com/sormuras/sandbox/tree/master/javadoc-link-non-modular Log with the error messages: https://github.com/sormuras/sandbox/runs/471844267#step:5:28
|