JDK-6962725 : Regtest javax/swing/JFileChooser/6738668/bug6738668.java fails under Linux
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: javax.swing
  • Affected Version: 7,8,9
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic
  • CPU: generic
  • Submitted: 2010-06-21
  • Updated: 2020-10-12
  • Resolved: 2017-06-06
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 10 JDK 8 Other
10 b23Fixed 8u270Fixed openjdk8u282Fixed
Related Reports
Relates :  
JDK-6738668 - JFileChooser cannot be created under SecurityManager
Relates :  
JDK-8194946 - Regression automated Test 'javax/swing/JFileChooser/6738668/bug6738668.java' fails
Description
Regtest javax/swing/JFileChooser/6738668/bug6738668.java fails under Linux.

There's an obvious problem with the test as it hardcodes "c:/temp" as file name. However, after correcting this, the test fails anyway.

Please be sure to update test/ProblemList.txt after the test is fixed.
Comments
Fix Request (8u) I would like to backport this only for codebase sync (I see 8u271). The patch applies cleanly, the failure message for the test is now different, but the test fails anyway, because real fix must come in JDK-8194946.
27-08-2020
RULE javax/swing/JFileChooser/6738668/bug6738668.java Exception java.security.AccessControlException: access denied ("java.io.FilePermission" "C:\Temp" "write") RULE javax/swing/JFileChooser/6738668/bug6738668.java Exception java.security.AccessControlException: access denied ("java.io.FilePermission" "C:\\Temp" "write")
02-09-2014
- this is an issue reported against 7(7u), - there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue - 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9 or 7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014
- this is an issue reported against 7(7u), - there are now affected version 9 filed for this issue - 7u issues are transferred to Sustaining Nevertheless if someone have a report against 9 - please reopen and add affectedVersion 9 or 7u specific escalations might be reopen to Sustaining
10-08-2014
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
These are all approved for deferral to JDK 9 so you can update the FixVersion to state JDK 9. Kind regards, Mathias
29-08-2013
Converted "8-client-defer-candidate" label to "8-defer-request" by SQE' OK.
15-08-2013
*This is anti-deferral criteria list*: - P2 -------------- Engineering's Criteria ------------------------------------- - tck-red labeled - conformance labeled - P3 regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - findbugs, parfait, eht labeled bugs - CAP <1 year reported - netbeans <1 year reported Victor ----------------- SQE's OK --------------------------------- Yes, we are ok with that thanks, Mikhail
15-08-2013
8-defer-request: This is the issue from 7 GA when it was approved to defer that time. Requesting to defer again because there are no customer escalations on this issue.
14-06-2013