JDK-8021861 : setExtendedState(Frame.NORMAL) does not restore an AWT Frame under Linux
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: java.awt
  • Affected Version: 7u25,8
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Duplicate
  • OS: linux
  • Submitted: 2013-07-30
  • Updated: 2014-01-27
  • Resolved: 2014-01-27
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 9
9Resolved
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
JDK-8012224 - AWT_TopLevels/TopLevelEvents/Automated/WindowIconifyDeiconifyEventsTest02 fails on Ubuntu 12.04 Unity shell
Description
On Linux create an AWT Frame, iconify it with setExtendedState(Frame.ICONIFIED). It iconifies successfully.
Then try to restore it with setExtendedState(Frame.NORMAL). The frame does not get restored.
Under Windows the same works fine.
Please, see the atached program demonstrating the issue.
Comments
RULE AWT_UndecoratedFrame/Automated/AWT/Repaint RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/Frame/GetStateTest/GetStateTest.html RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/Frame/MoreThanOneListener/MoreThanOneListenerTest.html RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/JFrame/MoreThanOneListener/MoreThanOneListenerTest.html RULE AWT_UndecoratedFrame/Automated/Swing/Iconify RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/JFrame/GetStateTest/GetStateTest.html RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/UndecoratedFrame/GetStateTest/GetStateTest.html RULE AWT_ZoomFrame/Automated/UndecoratedFrame/MoreThanOneListener/MoreThanOneListenerTest.html RULE AWT_TopLevels/TopLevelEvents/Automated/WindowIconifyDeiconifyEventsTest01
07-11-2013
We've reviewed your bulk request (120 bugs) and are OK with deferring them to JDK 9. You can go ahead and update these to: - Set label to 8-defer-approved - FixVersion to 9 Thanks for doing a great job of summarizing the details for the bulk deferral for us! Kind regards, Mathias
19-09-2013
The criteria for deferral bulk request bugs: - Not P2 - Not tck-red or conformance labeled - Not regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - Not findbugs, parfait, eht, fuzzing labeled - Not netbeans, licbug, cap, cap-8 labeled against jdk8
18-09-2013
The criteria for deferral bulk request bugs: - Not P2 - Not tck-red or conformance labeled - Not regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - Not findbugs, parfait, eht, fuzzing labeled - Not netbeans, licbug, cap, cap-8 labeled against jdk8
18-09-2013
The criteria for deferral bulk request bugs: - Not P2 - Not tck-red or conformance labeled - Not regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - Not findbugs, parfait, eht, fuzzing labeled - Not netbeans, licbug, cap, cap-8 labeled against jdk8
18-09-2013
The criteria for deferral bulk request bugs: - Not P2 - Not tck-red or conformance labeled - Not regressions reported/labeled against jdk8 - Not findbugs, parfait, eht, fuzzing labeled - Not netbeans, licbug, cap, cap-8 labeled against jdk8
18-09-2013
jdk8: SQE OK to defer
17-09-2013
I believe this one can be duplicated to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8012224 (or vice versa).
02-09-2013
what is Introduced in release?
30-07-2013