The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed. Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved. Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
# accessible actions
toggle expand=toggle expand
The above resource will be interpreted as
value: expand = toggle expand.
Tomonori Shioda added a comment - 2013-06-24 18:30
On 02.07.2013 18:53, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi Victor/Ragini,
> It is critical for our translation process. Without the fix, the translation will come back as:
> toggle expand=toggle expand
> ./jdk/src/share/classes/com/sun/accessibility/internal/resources/accessibility_ja.properties:toggle \u30C8\u30B0\u30EB\u5C55\u958B
> ./jdk/src/share/classes/com/sun/accessibility/internal/resources/accessibility_ko.properties:toggle \uD655\uC7A5=\uD1A0\uAE00 \uD655\uC7A5
> ./jdk/src/share/classes/com/sun/accessibility/internal/resources/accessibility_sv.properties:toggle ut\u00F6ka=v\u00E4xla ut\u00F6ka
This is not critical , but is an easy fix.
The impact is very low as the fix is to change the String value for TOGGLE_EXPAND in AccessibleAction from "Toggle Expand" to "ToggleExpand".
And a follow up change in jdk/src/share/classes/com/sun/accessibility/internal/resources/accessibility.properties and all localized versions.
can anybody please provide info on impact of this bug?
It is a straightforward one. Removing deferred keyword, will fix it.
seems like if it is an easy fix, it should be in 7u40
Still pending Justification and SQE-OK. Once we get those, we'll need to give the Release Team a little time to review. If you have the Dev Justification and SQE-OK tomorrow am (06/25/13) - I should be able to approve in the afternoon.
I deleted the "discuss" label - as this was just to test my query.
I just added "discuss" as a test - to test my query - I will remove this shortly
still no justification
Ragini, please justify this deferral request and obtain SQE's OK
Added deferral request label.
Is it 7u40 critical or deferral candidate?
Please evaluate and assign responsible engineer. This issues causes l10n bug in multiple locales that I have to fix every time there is a translation drop.
This bug keeps on causing l10n issues every time we have a message drop.