JDK-4634399 : javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier doesn't respect contract for equals and hashCod
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: client-libs
  • Sub-Component: javax.imageio
  • Affected Version: 1.4.0
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic
  • CPU: generic
  • Submitted: 2002-02-07
  • Updated: 2017-05-16
  • Resolved: 2003-08-11
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availabitlity Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
5.0 tigerFixed
Related Reports
Relates :  
Description
The following problem was originally reported in 4634068.

There are a number of classes that do not respect the
implied contract for equals and hashCode. See, for example,
Joshua Bloch's book "Effective Java", items 7-8.

javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier redefines
  equals(Object) but not
  hashCode()
javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier$Banded redefines
  equals(Object) but not
  hashCode()
javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier$Interleaved redefines
  equals(Object) but not
  hashCode()

Problems found by applying automatic tools to JDK
libraries. However, manual inspectation of the classes
reveals the same problems.

-- iag@sfbay 2002-02-06

Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: tiger FIXED IN: tiger INTEGRATED IN: tiger tiger-b15
2004-06-14

EVALUATION Implemented the 3 missing hashCode() methods for the classes listed in the description field. ###@###.### 2003-07-21
2003-07-21