JDK-4628281 : REGRESSION: Int. links missing from return/param types when .java files passd in
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: tools
  • Sub-Component: javadoc(tool)
  • Affected Version: 1.4.0,1.4.1
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic,linux
  • CPU: generic,x86
  • Submitted: 2002-01-25
  • Updated: 2002-10-26
  • Resolved: 2002-10-26
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
1.4.2 mantisFixed
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
Duplicate :  
Description

Name: rmT116609			Date: 01/24/2002


java version "1.4.0-rc"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-rc-b91)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0-rc-b91, mixed mode)

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
When I call the javadoc with a list of files it does not generate crossreferences between classes/interfaces for the parameter and return values.

REGRESSION.  Last worked in version 1.3.1_02

STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
1. Create the following interfaces:
   
   First:

   package de;

   public interface class1 {}

   Second:

   package de;

   public interface class2 {
      public class1 getClass1Object(class1 param);
   }

2. Optionally create a file which contains both interfaces.

3. Run javadoc:
   javadoc de/class1.java de/class2.java 


EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
The parameter and return value of method class2.getClass1Object should be links to class1.

Actual only the string de.class1 appears.

This bug can be reproduced always.

Release Regression From : 1.3.1_02
The above release value was the last known release where this 
bug was knwon to work. Since then there has been a regression.

(Review ID: 138599) 
======================================================================

Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: mantis FIXED IN: mantis INTEGRATED IN: mantis mantis-b05
2004-06-14

PUBLIC COMMENTS ...
2004-06-10

EVALUATION A regression, so we should fix this for the next release. ###@###.### 2002-01-25 > When you specify classes on the command line instead of packages, the > links to parameter and return types are missing from the method > signature. This happens because ClassDoc.isIncluded() returns false, > even though the corresponding class was specified on the command line. > Is this a bug in the Javadoc tool? You can use my regression test to > verify this bug: > > /home/jh104163/stdbugs/4628281/test/com/sun/javadoc/testReturnParamLinks ###@###.### 2002-04-01 Re-worded the synopsis from: REGRESSION: javadoc doesn't generate cross references between classes/interfaces to: REGRESSION: Int. links missing from return/param types when .java files passd in so it more specifically identifies the problem (to differentiate it from numerous other link bugs). ###@###.### 2002-09-18
2002-09-18