JDK-4524136 : stddoclet: label in "link" tag is ignored when apiname is a package name
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: tools
  • Sub-Component: javadoc(tool)
  • Affected Version: 1.4.0
  • Priority: P4
  • Status: Resolved
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: windows_98
  • CPU: x86
  • Submitted: 2001-11-07
  • Updated: 2014-05-05
  • Resolved: 2002-10-25
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
1.4.2 mantisFixed
Description

Name: jl125535			Date: 11/07/2001


java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0-C)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0-C, mixed mode)

Consider this code:

-----

package com.example.test;

/**
 * This is a comment
 * <br> Package Link {@link com.example.test Package Text}
 */
public class DocTest
{
}

-----

Running javadoc produces a DocTest.html file that contains the following line:

 <br> Package Link <A HREF="../../../com/example/test/package-summary.html">com.example.test</A>

But the line should read

 <br> Package Link <A HREF="../../../com/example/test/package-summary.html">Package Text</A>

This behavior appears on both Solaris 8 and Windows 2000.  The behavior may appear on other
platforms.

(Review ID: 134709) 
======================================================================

Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: mantis FIXED IN: mantis INTEGRATED IN: mantis mantis-b05
2004-06-14

PUBLIC COMMENTS This bug has been fixed. ###@###.### 2002-07-19
2002-07-19

EVALUATION Confirmed ###@###.### 2002-02-03 This bug has been fixed. The label specified now shows up in the output for {@link} tags. This bug fix is pending review. ###@###.### 2002-07-19
2002-02-03