JDK-4305459 : GetBytecodes returns byte 0 instead of 1
- Type: Bug
- Component: hotspot
- Sub-Component: jvmti
- Affected Version: 1.4.2,6
- Priority: P3
- Status: Resolved
- Resolution: Fixed
- OS: generic,windows_nt
- CPU: generic,x86
- Submitted: 2000-01-19
- Updated: 2012-10-01
- Resolved: 2004-08-30
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.
To download the current JDK release, click here.
| JDK 6 |
|---|
6 mustangFixed  |
Description
Name: dkC59003 Date: 01/18/2000 The HotSpot VM 1.3.0rc1-S fails the test nsk/jvmdi/GetBytecodes/bytecodes001 from testbase_nsk as function GetBytecodes returns invalid byte. Classic works fine. To reproduce the bug run doit.bat <jdk root directory> in /net/sqesvr/vsn/GammaBase/Bugs/<this bug number> (To try classic VM run doit.bat <jdk root directory> -classic) The test outputs: java version "1.3.0rc1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0rc1-S) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0rc1-S, mixed mode) Name = <init>, sig = ()V: code index = 3: byte expected: 0x1, got: 0x0 ====================================================================== Name: ipR10196 Date: 08/26/2003 Similar bug is revealed for the corresponding JVMTI function GetBytecodes(). The tests affected are: nsk/jvmti/GetBytecodes/bytecodes001 Ivan Popov <###@###.###> ======================================================================
Comments
|