JDK-6997297 : assert(check_obj_alignment(result)) failed: address not aligned: 0x...
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: hotspot
  • Sub-Component: compiler
  • Affected Version: hs20
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Duplicate
  • OS: generic
  • CPU: generic
  • Submitted: 2010-11-03
  • Updated: 2012-02-01
  • Resolved: 2010-12-21
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 7
7Resolved
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
Description
Test
	java/dyn/MethodHandlesTest.java	

may fail with

#  Internal Error (/tmp/jprt/P1/B/180208.jcoomes/source/src/share/vm/oops/oop.inline.hpp:176), pid=3737, tid=17
#  assert(check_obj_alignment(result)) failed: address not aligned: 0x00000000fb234903

Stack: [0xfffffd7ffa2c9000,0xfffffd7ffa3c9000],  sp=0xfffffd7ffa3c4510,  free space=1005k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V  [libjvm.so+0x251c479];;  void VMError::report(outputStream*)+0x6c5
V  [libjvm.so+0x251d520];;  void VMError::report_and_die()+0x4d8
V  [libjvm.so+0xe24d0f];;  void report_vm_error(const char*,int,const char*,const char*)+0x55f
V  [libjvm.so+0x10ce99b];;  Handle::Handle(Thread*,oop)+0xa27
V  [libjvm.so+0x13440f0];;  void InterpreterRuntime::resolve_invoke(JavaThread*,Bytecodes::Code)+0xcf0
j  org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate()V+86
j  org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(Lorg/junit/runners/model/FrameworkMethod;Lorg/junit/runner/notification/RunNotifier;)V+31
j  org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/junit/runner/notification/RunNotifier;)V+6
...

Comments
EVALUATION This seems to be a duplicate of 7007377. I couldn't reproduce any crash with 7007377 applied.
21-12-2010