JDK-6449385 : JCK test dup2_x200106m1 fails with Segmentation Fault on x86
  • Type: Bug
  • Component: hotspot
  • Sub-Component: compiler
  • Affected Version: 2.0,3.0,hs14,5.0u4
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: linux,solaris,solaris_10
  • CPU: generic,x86
  • Submitted: 2006-07-17
  • Updated: 2012-03-22
  • Resolved: 2011-03-07
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
JDK 6 JDK 7 Other
6u18Fixed 7Fixed hs16Fixed
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
JDK-6756390 - JVM dumps core in C1
Description
Run reproduce.sh from attched archive to reproduce a problem.
bug originally filed on development version of java RTS 2.0 but that appears to be an hotspot bug.
crashes the same way with java 5u4 and a fastdebug build (does not crash with a jvmg or product build)
Comments
EVALUATION http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/1b42d5772ae0
16-04-2009
SUGGESTED FIX Make the stack size be consistent between platforms.
31-07-2006
EVALUATION It's not infinite recursion, it's just very deep. The test case does repeated jsrs to the next bytecode and since C1 parses jsrs using recursion you can recurse fairly deeply before finishing. The stack size for compiler threads is inconsistently specified as well. It defaults to the same a VMThreadStackSize if CompilerThreadStackSize == 0. For some reason on solaris x86 it's specified as 256k instead of 512k as it is on windows and linux. So solaris x86 is more exposed to stack overflows from the compiler that other platforms.
31-07-2006
WORK AROUND Increase the compiler threads stack using -XX:CompilerThreadStackSize=512
31-07-2006
EVALUATION There appears to be an infinite recursion in the c1 compiler code (bug does not reproduce with -Xint nor -server): Here's part of the stack at the crash: ... [1014] GraphBuilder::iterate_bytecodes_for_block(this = ???, bci = ???) (optim ized), at 0xcd4d9c82 (line ~2414) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1015] GraphBuilder::connect_to_end(this = ???, beg = ???) (optimized), at 0xc d4d5ffb (line ~2188) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1016] GraphBuilder::iterate_all_blocks(this = ???, start_in_current_block_for _inlining = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4dbc95 (line ~2517) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp " [1017] GraphBuilder::try_inline_jsr(this = ???, jsr_dest_bci = ???) (optimized ), at 0xcd4e0436 (line ~3194) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1018] GraphBuilder::jsr(this = ???, dest = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4ce5f8 (l ine ~1203) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1019] GraphBuilder::iterate_bytecodes_for_block(this = ???, bci = ???) (optim ized), at 0xcd4d9c82 (line ~2414) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1020] GraphBuilder::connect_to_end(this = ???, beg = ???) (optimized), at 0xc d4d5ffb (line ~2188) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1021] GraphBuilder::iterate_all_blocks(this = ???, start_in_current_block_for _inlining = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4dbc95 (line ~2517) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp " [1022] GraphBuilder::try_inline_jsr(this = ???, jsr_dest_bci = ???) (optimized ), at 0xcd4e0436 (line ~3194) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1023] GraphBuilder::jsr(this = ???, dest = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4ce5f8 (l ine ~1203) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1024] GraphBuilder::iterate_bytecodes_for_block(this = ???, bci = ???) (optim ized), at 0xcd4d9c82 (line ~2414) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1025] GraphBuilder::connect_to_end(this = ???, beg = ???) (optimized), at 0xc d4d5ffb (line ~2188) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1026] GraphBuilder::iterate_all_blocks(this = ???, start_in_current_block_for _inlining = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4dbc95 (line ~2517) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp " [1027] GraphBuilder::try_inline_jsr(this = ???, jsr_dest_bci = ???) (optimized ), at 0xcd4e0436 (line ~3194) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1028] GraphBuilder::jsr(this = ???, dest = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4ce5f8 (l ine ~1203) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1029] GraphBuilder::iterate_bytecodes_for_block(this = ???, bci = ???) (optim ized), at 0xcd4d9c82 (line ~2414) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1030] GraphBuilder::connect_to_end(this = ???, beg = ???) (optimized), at 0xc d4d5ffb (line ~2188) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1031] GraphBuilder::iterate_all_blocks(this = ???, start_in_current_block_for _inlining = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4dbc95 (line ~2517) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp " [1032] GraphBuilder::GraphBuilder(this = ???, compilation = ???, scope = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4de93c (line ~2882) in "c1_GraphBuilder.cpp" [1033] IRScope::build_graph(this = ???, compilation = ???, osr_bci = ???) (opt imized), at 0xcd4e9afd (line ~122) in "c1_IR.cpp" [1034] IRScope::IRScope(this = ???, compilation = ???, caller = ???, caller_bc i = ???, method = ???, osr_bci = ???, create_graph = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4e 9d1d (line ~155) in "c1_IR.cpp" [1035] IR::IR(this = ???, compilation = ???, method = ???, osr_bci = ???) (opt imized), at 0xcd4ea386 (line ~270) in "c1_IR.cpp" [1036] Compilation::build_hir(this = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4be8fb (line ~95 ) in "c1_Compilation.cpp" [1037] Compilation::compile_java_method(this = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4bf4cf (line ~250) in "c1_Compilation.cpp" [1038] Compilation::compile_method(this = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4bf7fa (lin e ~317) in "c1_Compilation.cpp" [1039] Compilation::Compilation(this = ???, compiler = ???, env = ???, method = ???, osr_bci = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4c0070 (line ~424) in "c1_Compilation. cpp" [1040] Compiler::compile_method(this = ???, env = ???, method = ???, entry_bci = ???) (optimized), at 0xcd4c136a (line ~36) in "c1_Compiler.cpp"
21-07-2006
EVALUATION hotspot bug that show up only with fastdebug builds.
19-07-2006