EVALUATION
A regression, so we should fix this for the next release.
###@###.### 2002-01-25
> When you specify classes on the command line instead of packages, the
> links to parameter and return types are missing from the method
> signature. This happens because ClassDoc.isIncluded() returns false,
> even though the corresponding class was specified on the command line.
> Is this a bug in the Javadoc tool? You can use my regression test to
> verify this bug:
>
> /home/jh104163/stdbugs/4628281/test/com/sun/javadoc/testReturnParamLinks
###@###.### 2002-04-01
Re-worded the synopsis
from:
REGRESSION: javadoc doesn't generate cross references between classes/interfaces
to:
REGRESSION: Int. links missing from return/param types when .java files passd in
so it more specifically identifies the problem (to differentiate it from
numerous other link bugs).
###@###.### 2002-09-18
|