JDK-4208989 : Provide more information with warnings
  • Type: Enhancement
  • Component: tools
  • Sub-Component: javadoc(tool)
  • Affected Version: 1.1.7,1.2.0,1.4.0
  • Priority: P3
  • Status: Closed
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • OS: generic,solaris_2.5.1,solaris_2.6
  • CPU: generic,sparc
  • Submitted: 1999-02-04
  • Updated: 2002-06-27
  • Resolved: 2001-06-22
The Version table provides details related to the release that this issue/RFE will be addressed.

Unresolved : Release in which this issue/RFE will be addressed.
Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved.
Fixed : Release in which this issue/RFE has been fixed. The release containing this fix may be available for download as an Early Access Release or a General Availability Release.

To download the current JDK release, click here.
Other
1.4.0 beta2Fixed
Related Reports
Duplicate :  
Duplicate :  
Duplicate :  
Duplicate :  
Relates :  
Description
Please consider adding at least line number information for each warning.  If
you used the same format as javac, that would be great.  This would let
let users step through the warnings in their favorite editors and fix them.

Comments
CONVERTED DATA BugTraq+ Release Management Values COMMIT TO FIX: merlin-beta2 FIXED IN: merlin-beta2 INTEGRATED IN: merlin-beta2 VERIFIED IN: merlin-beta3
14-06-2004

PUBLIC COMMENTS A new class SourcePosition has been added to the javadoc API, and new methods "public SourcePosition position();" in Doc and Tag have been added (see 4192783) The diagnostics produced by the javadoc tool and the standard doclet now include source position information.
10-06-2004

EVALUATION Yes, we currently don't have that information in the warnings. But it is definitely needed. I will look into this. atul.dambalkar@eng 1999-02-05 The tool does have that information, and I plan to extend the API to expose source position information so that doclets will have the information as well. To also solve 4266005, make sure the line number for the language-provided default constructor is "none". neal.gafter@Eng 2001-03-06
06-03-2001